Compatibility with e10s

Post information about bugs here

Compatibility with e10s

Postby makondo » Sun Mar 01, 2015 10:57 pm

It appears there's a bug filed but in that bug they seem to refer to Nicholas and SCClock (CB² developers) as CB developers. I wonder if Anton is aware. I'm not going to post in the bug for now to let them know but Anton or morat should. And, of course, should look into that bug too Image
makondo
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Compatibility with e10s

Postby trapper john » Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:05 pm

Anton seems to have vanished. I'm having a few button issues with e10s but it's not the addon causing it but the code. They still work when multi-process is disabled so I imagine many others are going to have that same problem if and when Mozilla decides to shove their buggy e10s down everyone's throat and without the ability to disable them.
trapper john
 
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 6:58 pm

Re: Compatibility with e10s

Postby morat » Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:18 pm

I doubt Mozilla will remove the ability to disable e10s before they kill XUL so e10s support is a waste of time.

P.S.

I read that Arantius (i.e. greasemonkey developer) worked on e10s support for an entire year.

Arantius wrote:We appear to be compatible. It was quite an exercise to reach this point.

Greasemonkey addon does not work with e10s
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1048164
morat
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 2:38 pm


Return to Bug report